# The Double-Slit Experiment

By John Dobson

Published 2004-10-22 13:05:52

From 1996

Richard Feynman has pointed out that every statement in quantum mechanics
is a restatement of Heisenberg' uncertainty principle. Now Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that the product of our
uncertainty in the position of a particle and our uncertainty in its momentum can never be less than a certain small quantity,
namely Planck's constant over two pi. Also that our uncertainty in the energy of a particle and our uncertainty in when it
has that energy can never be less than that same small amount.

Feynman has also pointed out that the entire mystery of quantum mechanics is in the double-slit experiment.
And that is what makes it so very interesting. From the standpoint of common sense, as Feynman himself has pointed out, the
behavior of Nature is absurd. And this absurdity is nowhere more obvious than in the double-slit experiment. But before we
discuss the double-slit experiment, let us go back to Einstein's 1905 geometry.

Euclid's geometry is a theoretical geometry about a theoretical space that does not
in fact exist. And Newton's physics is a theoretical physics about a theoretical world that does not in fact exist. So we
have had to change all that with relativity and quantum mechanics. In 1905 Einstein succeeded in putting time into geometry
where it belongs. He changed our geometry form 3-D to 4-D. and in Pythagoras' theorem for four dimensions, time comes in squared
with a minus sign, so that if the space and time separations between two events are equal, the total space-time separation
between them is zero. Distances in space are not objective, nor are lengths of time. Observers moving with respect to each
other may disagree on how far it is from there to here and on how long it took from then till now, but they will all agree
on the total space-time separation between there-then and here-now. Four-dimensional addresses (where and when) are objective,
and the space-time intervals between them are also objective, regardless of your position or your state of motion.

Now in discussing the double-slit experiment,
it will be important to remember what happened to our geometry in 1905. Space and time come into that geometry as a pair of
opposites. And since, between the emission and the absorption events of a single photon, the time separation as always equal
to the space separation (for all observers), the total separation between those two events must always be zero. When Einstein
threw out the luminiferous ether, he should have thrown out the photons that moved in it. They do not show up in his physics.
When he threw out the lake, he should have thrown out the fish that swam in it.

The mystery of the double-slit experiment is this: that if the photons go one at a
time through the slits, how do they know that both slits are open?

From a little distance away we shoot a laser through two closely spaced slits and watch the absorption
events on a scintillating screen behind the slits. What we see is that when one slit is closed, most of the scintillation
points fall behind the other slit, as we would expect. But when both slits are open, most of the scintillation points fall
not behind the two slits, as we would expect, but between them. It is as though the photons had come through as waves and
showed an interference pattern on the screen. And the question is this: since photons come through one at a time, how do they
know that both slits are open?

It
will be necessary here to remember that space and time are a pair of opposites and that the total separation between the emission
and absorption events are adjacent in space-time. Now the adjacency has two components, a space component and a time component,
and it is in the space component of the adjacency that both slits are open. It is not that the photons go through one or the
other slit, but only that the space components of the trajectories have both slits open.

But suppose we do the double-slit experiment with electrons instead of photons. Then
the emission and absorption events will not be adjacent in space-time, because the electrons can't travel at the speed of
light. And then the space and time components of the trajectories will not be equal. What the? Still we get the same result.
If both slits are open, we get interference on the screen behind the slits. Why? Because even if the space and time components
fo the trajectories are not equal, still both slits are open for the space components.

As Amit Goswami says, "We never, never see the wave aspect of a single quantum
object." The wave aspect is in the space component of the trajectory.

Feynman's "sum-over-histories" approach suggests that we must allow that
the photon (or the electron) could have gone by any possible way from the laser (or the electron gun) to the screen, and we
sum-over-the-histories to calculate the probability of its arrival. Actually what we do is to sum-over-the-space-components-of-the-trajectories,
whether for a photon or an electron.

For
a detailed description of the double-slit experiment please see Richard Feynman's Six Easy Pieces. It's in the last chapter
on Quantum Behavior.